20. Stewardship - Protected Areas and Land Use Planning

Le rapport sur l’état de l’environnement 2022 est un document technique destiné à un usage interne. Il n’est disponible qu’en anglais.

Sunset, NWT - GNWT

Introduction

The Northwest Territories (NWT) conservation network, includes protected areas and conservation areas with complementary but less restrictive protection (e.g., conservation zones in land use plans).  In the NWT, conservation areas are equivalent to other effective area-based conservation measures (OECMs) as defined in national and international biodiversity targets. Within the conservation network there is limited industrial impact which provides a means to measure where there will be less industrial impact on the landscape. The conservation network is also a key tool for supporting stewardship activities such as conserving biodiversity, ecosystem health, ecological processes, food security, and special natural and cultural values.

Indicators such as the percentage of land conserved are standard reporting measures for national and international State of Environment reports. Tracking stewardship and progress with respect to local decision-making is part of the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity.

 

20.1 Trends in the amount of land within the Terrestrial Conservation Network

 

This indicator tracks the amount of land set conserved through a terrestrial conservation network, including freshwater. Marine protected areas are reported on within indicator 20.3 – Trends in amount of marine areas within marine protected areas.

Boat, Photo provided by B. Hanna

The conservation network in the NWT consists of protected areas and conservation areas at various scales that collectively contribute to ecological, economic and social stability more than individual sites could alone. At the core of the conservation network are protected areas, which are ecologically intact and have the highest level of protection, including prohibiting industrial development. As defined by the International Union for Conservation of Nature, protected areas are permanent, resilient and are effectively managed and monitored (Ref. 1). Conservation areas (e.g. conservation zoning in regional land use plans), in contrast, provide complementary but less restrictive protection than protected areas, while still contributing to the conservation network by protecting various natural and cultural values.

This indicator was prepared by the Government of the Northwest Territories, Department of Environment and Nature Resources, using geo-referenced spatial data obtained from the GNWT, Natural Resources Canada, Parks Canada, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Gwich’in Land Use Planning Board; Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada, Sahtu Land Use Planning Board and Tłįchǫ Government.

 

NWT Focus

In the NWT, the land and water are integral to Indigenous cultures and the wellbeing of all people. A conservation network is an effective and equitable way to ensure the NWT’s cultures, land, and water stay healthy for future generations. Making sure that land in the NWT remains healthy for future generations is a priority of the GNWT.

Conservation network planning has been ongoing in the NWT for decades with the establishment of areas like the Thelon Wildlife Sanctuary and several National Parks and Migratory Bird Sanctuaries. In 1999, the NWT Protected Areas Strategy (PAS) formalized a planning process in partnership with communities, governments, environmental non-governmental organizations and industry (Ref. 2). Through this community–led process, the Saoyú-ʔehdacho National Historic Site was established, several other candidate areas were identified across the territory, and assessments were conducted to work towards formal designation for these areas.

Building upon the PAS process the GNWT, in 2016, developed “Healthy Land, Healthy People: GNWT’s Priorities for Advancement of Conservation Network Planning 2016-2021” (Ref. 3), a five-year work plan that outlined how the GNWT was moving forward collaboratively with conservation network planning in the NWT which included an objective to finalize candidate areas identified through the PAS process. The GNWT is engaging on the next iteration Healthy Land, Healthy People work plan for the next five years and anticipates it will be released late in 2022.

Recognizing a need for a territorial mechanism to permanently protect these candidate areas, the GNWT, in partnership with Indigenous governments and organizations, regulatory boards, non-government organizations, industry representatives, and the public, developed the Protected Areas Act (PAA), which came into force in June of 2019. The PAA provides the legislative framework for protecting, conserving, and maintaining biodiversity, ecological integrity and cultural continuity of the NWT through the creation of a network of permanent Territorial Protected Areas that are representative of the ecosystems and cultural landscapes found in the territory. The GNWT establishes Territorial Protected Areas through agreement with Indigenous governments and organizations and works to manage these areas collaboratively. To date, the GNWT has established two Territorial Protected Areas through this legislation, Thaidene Nëné and Ts’udé Nilįné Tuyeta.

In addition to formal designation of protected areas, using both territorial and federal mechanisms, conservation network planning in the NWT also involves the establishment of conservation areas. There are mechanisms that provide a degree of protection to the land including some designations under the Territorial Parks Act and Wildlife Conservation Areas under the NWT Wildlife Act that have regulations in place pertaining to protection. However, one of the main ways that lands in the NWT are protected outside of formal protected area designation is through conservation zoning in regional land use plans. Regional land use plans specify which land use activities are allowed in a given area. Generally, regional land use plans designate some areas where development is prohibited, referred to as conservation zoning. An approved land use plan is legally binding on all parties and is reviewed every five years so it can be adaptable to changing social, environmental and economic needs. There are approved land use plans in place for the Gwich’in Settlement Area and Sahtu Settlement Area, pursuant to the Mackenzie Valley Resource Management Act, and an additional land use plan on Tłįchǫ lands (Ref. 4-6). A land use planning process is also underway in the Dehcho Area (Ref. 7).

 

Current View: status and trend

The NWT conservation network includes several protected areas and conservation areas including lands administered by federal, territorial, and Indigenous governments. They differ in their management and in the type of protection provided.

Currently 170,455 km2 of NWT land (including fresh water) is in protected areas (12.7% of the NWT land base). This includes Territorial Protected Areas, National Parks/National Park Reserves, one National Historic Site (one of a kind with surface and subsurface protection), the Thelon Wildlife Sanctuary, Migratory Bird Sanctuaries, and areas established under Land Claim agreements.

Based on our current knowledge, an additional 61,780 km2 of NWT land (including fresh water) is protected as conservation areas, which include Territorial Natural Environmental Parks, the Gwich’in Territorial Recreational Park, Pingo Canadian Landmark, Thaidene Nëné Wildlife Conservation Area, and conservation zoning in approved regional land use plans. In total 232,235 km2 (17.3% of the NWT land base (including freshwater)) is currently considered to be within the established conservation network. Figure 1 shows the current conservation network in the NWT.

 

Figure 1: Map of established terrestrial conservation network in the NWT (January 2022).

 

Looking around

As the most globally recognized way to conserve biodiversity, national and global biodiversity targets for protected areas have been developed. In 2010, at the tenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity, a Strategic Plan for Biodiversity for the next decade was adopted, which included the launching of the Aichi Biodiversity Targets. The Aichi Targets include 20 individual targets, including Target 11 aimed at protecting and conserving at least 17 percent of the global land base and 10 percent of the global marine area by 2020. In response, in 2015 the Federal Government of Canada established a series of national goals known as “The 2020 Biodiversity Goals and Targets for Canada.” Target 1, in this set reflects the Aichi Target 11 and commits the country to the 17 and 10 percent goals by 2020.

Federal, provincial, and territorial governments agreed to work together through the Pathway to Canada Target 1 initiative to develop a plan for how jurisdictions can contribute to reaching the terrestrial component Target 1. The resulting One With Nature report provides broad guidance for this effort and further best practices and indicators for making and measuring success are being developed continually. Achieving the marine component of Target 1 is the federal department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada’s responsibility.

The federal government has committed to conserve and protect 25% of Canada’s land and 25% of Canada’s oceans by 2025, and work towards 30% of each by 2030 and has committed considerable funds to achieve these goals. A global biodiversity framework for the next decade is expected to be concluded by the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Convention of Biodiversity in 2022. This global framework is also anticipated to include a target to protect and conserve 30% of the global terrestrial land base and oceans by 2030. The GNWT will continue to engage in national conservation discussions, however decisions in the NWT will continue to be made in collaboration with Indigenous governments, Indigenous organizations and stakeholder input. This work will contribute to, but is not based on, these federal targets.

The authoritative Canada-wide spatial database of protected areas is the Canadian Protected and Conserved Areas Database administered by Environment and Climate Change Canada.

Information from this indicator, specifically on protected areas, is used by the following organizations and programs:

 

Looking forward

The GNWT is currently working on a renewed work plan to guide conservation network planning priorities in the future. This plan will inform ongoing work on the management of the conservation network, as any potential interest in new candidate areas.

Figure 2 shows both established protected and conservation areas in the NWT and all the areas currently proposed for conservation purposes. The proposed areas are at various stages of planning and most are under interim protection. They may not all become protected areas or conservation areas, and boundaries illustrated may be subject to change. The Dehcho Land Use Planning Committee continues to work on their regional land use plan. A 2006 public version has been updated but is currently not publicly available. For this reason, conservation zoning in the current interim draft Dehcho land use plan is not reflected on the map in Figure 2.

For trends in achieving ecological representation in the NWT, see Indicator 20.2.

Figure 2: Map of established and proposed conservation network in the NWT (January 2022).

 

Find out more

For more information:

 

Technical Notes

The calculation of amount of NWT lands within the NWT conservation network is based on best current information on what is a protected area and conservation area and subject to change as more information becomes available. For individual sizes and the most up-to-date information on the NWT conservation network, visit the NWT Conservation Network Planning page at https://www.ecc.gov.nt.ca/en/services/conservation-network-planning

 

References

Ref. 1. Dudley, N., ed. Guidelines for applying protected areas management categories. 2008, IUCN: Gland, Switzerland. x+ 86 pp. Available at: http://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/guidelines_for_applying_protected_area_management_categories.pdf

Ref. 2.  Northwest Territories Protected Areas Strategy Advisory Committee. 1999. Northwest Territories Protected Areas Strategy: A Balanced Approach to Establishing Protected Areas in the Northwest Territories. Available at: http://www.nwtpas.ca/documents/document-1999-PASmanualcomplete.pdf

Ref. 3.  Environment and Climate Change, 2016. Healthy Land, Healthy People: Government of the Northwest Territories Priorities for Advancement of Conservation Network Planning 2016-2021. 2016. Department of Environment and Climate Change, Government of the Northwest Territories, Yellowknife, NT. 20pp. Available at https://www.ecc.gov.nt.ca/en/services/conservation-network-planning/healthy-land-healthy-people 

Ref. 4.  Tłįchǫ Government. 2012. Tłįchǫ Wenek'e - Tłįchǫ Land Use Plan, Tłįchǫ Government: Behchokǫ̀, NT, Canada. Available at: www.tlicho.ca

Ref. 5.  Sahtu Land Use Planning Board. 2013. Sahtu Land Use PlanFort Good Hope, NT, Canada: Sahtu Land Use Planning Board. Available at: http://www.sahtulanduseplan.org/website/web-content/index.html

Ref. 6.  Gwich'in Land Use Planning Board. 2003. Nành Geenjit Gwitr'it T'igwaa'in, Working for the Land - The Gwich'in Land Use Plan, Gwich'in Land Use Planning Board: Inuvik, NT, Canada. p. i-166. Available at: http://www.gwichinplanning.nt.ca/landUsePlan.html

Ref. 7.  Dehcho Land Use Planning Committee. 2006. Respect for the Land: The Dehcho Land Use Plan. Final Draft Plan - May 2006Fort Providence, NT: Dehcho Land Use Planning Committee. Available at: http://www.dehcholands.org/home.htm

Ref. 8.  Government of Canada. 2021. Canadian Protected and Conserved Areas Database. Available at: https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/national-wildlife-areas/protected-conserved-areas-database.html.

 

20.2 Trends in achieving ecological representation

 

J. Schroder, NWT - GNWT

This indicator tracks the ecological representation achieved by the current established conservation network in the NWT. This indicator measures the progress towards the protection of key selected landscape features (land cover types, physiographic units) and the protection of selected special features in each of the 45 NWT ecoregions used for conservation network planning.

There are many reasons to protect areas of land and water. Sometimes areas are protected for cultural reasons, or to protect habitat for a species at risk, or to preserve scenic views. These are important, but in addition to such site-specific approaches a systematic approach is required to be successful at maintaining biodiversity and ecosystem integrity.

Ecological representation is part of a systematic conservation planning approach and seeks to protect biodiversity by using relatively coarse-scale data that are thought to be good surrogates for biodiversity (e.g. physical features such as soils, elevation, climate, vegetation). The underlying assumption with this approach is that species distribution is determined largely by environmental factors, such as climate and substrate, and that vegetation and other species assemblages respond to gradients of these factors across the landscape. Protecting examples of all types of landscape features within protected areas should capture the majority of species without having to consider those species individually.

Ensuring that the conservation network is representative of the wide variety of ecosystems in the NWT is a preventative conservation network planning approach to protecting biodiversity and maintaining ecosystem health in a changing world. This is one part of a broader solution to climate change by providing refuge for increasingly threated species and ecosystems, protection from ongoing human disturbance, and allowing for monitoring to better understand the scope of change in the territory.

Ecological representation is generally assessed at an ecoregion scale. An ecoregion is an area of land considered to have a distinctive regional climate, physical features, vegetation, and soil. A total of 45 ecoregions have been identified in the NWT for conservation network planning purposes (see Figure 1). These conservation network planning ecoregions were organized based on groupings of Level IV ecoregions in the revised NWT Ecosystem Classification (Ref. 1).

This indicator was prepared by the Government of the Northwest Territories (GNWT), Department of Environment and Nature Resources, using information obtained from the Environmental Stewardship and Climate Change Division.

Figure 1: NWT ecoregions for conservation network planning Source: ECC, GNWT

 

NWT Focus

The importance of protecting biodiversity and ecosystem integrity through a systematic approach was recognized in the NWT Protected Areas Strategy (PAS, signed in 1999), with a goal to identify and protect core representative areas in each ecoregion in the NWT.

In 2016, developed “Healthy Land, Healthy People: GNWT’s Priorities for Advancement of Conservation Network Planning 2016-2021” (Ref. 2), a five-year work plan that outlined how the GNWT would moving forward collaboratively with conservation network planning in the NWT and that also includes a target to develop a process to implement ecological representation planning. A new iteration for the next five years will be released in 2022.

 

Current View: status and trend

For 29 of the 45 conservation planning ecoregions in the NWT, at least a moderate level of ecological representation has been achieved by the established NWT conservation network.

Figure 2 shows a map of the average degree of ecological representation in each ecoregion of the NWT achieved by established protected and conservation areas. Because datasets of various different landscape features are used for the analysis, the results are shown on the maps as average representation of all landscape features in an ecoregion.

Figure 2: Map of Average Degree of Ecological Representation achieved by NWT terrestrial conservation network. Source: ECC, GNWT

There are 4 ecoregions where ecological representation is fully met and 4 where a very high degree of representation has been achieved.

There are 9 ecoregions in which a high degree of ecological representation has been achieved.

Currently, 7 of the 45 ecoregions of the NWT have no protected areas or conservation areas.

 

Looking around

The concept of ecological representation is applied to protected areas planning across Canada and the globe.

Internationally, the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity in its 2011-2021 Strategic Plan for Biodiversity had set 20 targets, including a target called Aichi Target 11.  This target includes a reference to ecological representation. It states:

“By 2020, at least 17 per cent of terrestrial and inland water, and 10 per cent of coastal and marine areas, especially areas of particular importance for biodiversity and ecosystem services, are conserved through effectively and equitably managed, ecologically representative and well connected systems of protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures, and integrated into the wider landscapes and seascapes” (Ref. 3)

Aichi Target 11 set the foundation for protected areas planning across the world. A global biodiversity framework for the decade up to 2030 is expected to be concluded by the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biodiversity in 2022. The new framework is expected to include a target to protect and conserve 30% of the global land and marine base and to also make reference to ecological representation.

Parks Canada has embodied representativeness in the objective for National Parks. Listed in the National Parks System Plan (Ref. 4) the objective includes “To protect for all time representative natural areas of Canadian significance in a system of national parks…” Canada is considered to have 39 terrestrial natural regions, and the goal is to represent each of those in a National Park. So far, 31 natural regions are represented by the 47 national parks and national park reserves in the system (Ref. 5). Parks Canada natural regions differ from the ecozones and ecoregions in the National Ecosystem Classification for all of Canada (A National Ecological Framework for Canada) and from the revised NWT ecosystem classification.

Ecological representation is also a component of planning for a national network of marine protected areas. The National Framework for Canada’s Network of Marine Protected Areas defines 12 broad ocean bioregions and aims to establish marine protected areas in each bioregion (Ref. 6). See indicator 20.3 for more information on marine protected areas in the NWT.

In Ontario, ecological representation is written as an objective in legislation. The Provincial Parks and Conservation Reserves Act, 2006, states “The purpose of this Act is to permanently protect a system of provincial parks and conservation reserves that includes ecosystems that are representative of all of Ontario’s natural regions…” (Ref. 7) The province of Ontario is divided into 14 ecoregions, then subdivided into 71 ecodistricts. For planning the parks system in Ontario, targets include (but are not limited to) establishing one park and at least one wilderness zone in each of Ontario’s 14 ecoregions, one natural environment park no less than 2,000 hectares in size in each of Ontario’s 71 ecodistricts, and at least one representative waterway class park in each of Ontario’s 71 ecodistricts (Ref. 8)

Saskatchewan is another Canadian jurisdiction that is basing its protected areas planning in part on ecological representation. The approach of the Saskatchewan Representative Areas Network is to represent the province’s biological diversity found within Saskatchewan’s 11 ecoregions by providing protection to at least one very large (>100,000 ha) and several smaller representative areas in each ecoregion (Ref. 9). The intention is that complete ecosystems are preserved, along with unique features.

 

Looking forward

Currently, there are proposed protected or conserved areas in several ecoregions of the NWT. If these are established, it will increase ecological representation in those ecoregions. Additionally, the GNWT’s “Healthy Land, Healthy People: GNWT’s Priorities for Advancement of Conservation Network Planning 2016-2021” work plan, includes a target to develop a process to identify, prioritize and fill gaps in ecological representation. A new iteration for the following five years is anticipated to include a similar target.

 

Find out more

For more information about conservation planning visit:

Convention on Biological Diversity. http://www.cbd.int/sp/targets/

Healthy Land, Healthy People: GNWT Priorities for Advancement of Conservation Network Planning 2016-2021: https://www.ecc.gov.nt.ca/en/services/conservation-network-planning/healthy-land-healthy-people Saskatchewan’s Representative Areas Network (RAN) - http://www.environment.gov.sk.ca/Default.aspx?DN=f6946bd6-174f-437f-82b9-14bbbee9db8d.

See Indicator 20.3: Trends in Marine Protected Areas for information on marine protected areas in the NWT.

 

Technical Notes

Ecological representation aims at protecting samples of all landscape features in a region (generally at the ecoregion sale) to help protect the majority of species. Therefore, degree of ecological representation indicates how well on average samples of all landscape features within each NWT ecoregions are represented in the NWT conservation network.

An ecoregion is an area of land considered to have a distinctive regional climate, physical features, vegetation, and soil. In the NWT a total of 45 ecoregions have been identified for conservation network planning purposes (see Figure 1) through groupings of Level IV ecoregions of the revised NWT Ecosystem Classification. This was necessary because Level IV ecoregions are more similar in size to ecodistricts and are not representative of units at an ecoregion scale.

The degree of ecological representation for an ecoregion is analyzed using a site selection software (MARXAN) (Ref. 10) and Geographic Information System (GIS) analysis. First, an ecoregion is analyzed in a broad sense, where the ecoregion is sub-divided into smaller landscape features or landscape elements based on physiographic units (combinations of physiographic characteristics such as elevation, climate, geology, topography and latitude) and vegetation types (such as spruce forest, tall shrubs, marsh, or bog). These landscape elements form the basis for a coarse-scale ecological representation analysis. The site selection software is then used to assess how well portions of each landscape element are captured within protected areas in each ecoregion. If portions of more than 90% or of all the landscape elements in a given ecoregion are included within protected areas, then ecological representation for that ecoregion is fully met. If samples of fewer landscape elements are captured within protected areas, then the degree of ecological representation for a given ecoregion is lower. If there are no protected areas in an ecoregion, that ecoregion has no ecological representation.

Ideally the ecological representation analysis would also assess the landscape at a finer scale to ensure that special features within those broad areas are not missed in the coarse-scale analysis. Special features are rare, unique or sensitive features. In the NWT, data on finer level special features that covers the whole NWT is mostly lacking, so that we are limited to focusing mainly on coarse-scale ecological representation analysis and looking at finer level data individually where it is available. Special features data that has been collected in the NWT includes amphibians and reptiles, beaches and beach ridges, deltas, eskers, areas of glacial refugia, karst features, hot and warm springs, mineral licks, plants and lichens, waterfalls and rapids.

An expert task team set up through the Pathway to Canada Target 1 initiative has recently provided a review of this topic and set out several principles for a national approach to achieving and assessing ecological representation in Canada (Ref. 11).

 

References

Ref. 1.  ECC. 2007-2013. NWT Ecosystem Classification. Available at https://www.ecc.gov.nt.ca/en/services/ecosystem-classification

Ref. 2. Environment and Climate Change, 2016. Healthy Land, Healthy People: Government of the Northwest Territories Priorities for Advancement of Conservation Network Planning 2016-2021. 2016. Department of Environment and Climate Change, Government of the Northwest Territories, Yellowknife, NT. 20pp. Available at https://www.ecc.gov.nt.ca/en/services/conservation-network-planning/healthy-land-healthy-people 

Ref. 3.  Convention on Biological Diversity. 2020. Available at http://www.cbd.int/sp/targets/

Ref. 4.  Parks Canada. 2019. National Park System Plan 1997. Available at https://www.pc.gc.ca/en/pn-np/plan

Ref. 5. Parks Canada. 2021. Map of completing the parks system. Available at https://www.pc.gc.ca/en/pn-np/cnpn-cnnp/carte-map

Ref. 6.  Fisheries and Oceans Canada. 2011. National Framework for Canada’s Network of Marine Protected Areas. Available at https://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/oceans/publications/mpanf-cnzpm/page01-eng.html

Ref. 7.  Province of Ontario. 2006. Provincial Parks and Conservation Reserves Act, 2006, (S.O. 2006, c- 12). Available at http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statutes/english/elaws_statutes_06p12_e.htm

Ref. 8.  Province of Ontario. 2011. State of Ontario’s Protected Areas Report. Available at http://www.ontario.ca/environment-and-energy/state-ontarios-protected-areas-report-full-report

Ref. 9.  Province of Saskatchewan. Saskatchewan Area Network Frequently Asked Questions. Available at http://www.environment.gov.sk.ca/adx/aspx/adxGetMedia.aspx?DocID=748,623,247,94,88,Documents&MediaID=321&Filename=RAN+FAQs.pdf&l=English

Ref. 10. MARXAN software. Available at http://www.uq.edu.au/marxan/

Ref. 11.  Pathway to Canada Target 1. Discussion Paper: Ecological Representation. Available at https://static1.squarespace.com/static/57e007452e69cf9a7af0a033/t/5b51de07352f5399d153ec89/1532091914974/Ecological+representation.pdf

 

20.3 Trends in Amount of Marine Protected Areas

 

Ice Breaking, NWT - GNWT

This indicator measures the total extent of marine area off the coast of the Northwest Territories (NWT) that has been set aside for conservation purposes as protected areas.

The Government of Canada has the responsibility to create protected areas in Canada’s oceans. Three different federal government departments have the authority to create marine protected areas (Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Environment and Climate Change Canada and Parks Canada). At present, the existing and proposed marine protected areas off the coast of the NWT are administered by Fisheries and Oceans Canada, in partnership with co-management partners, Fisheries Joint Management Committee (FJMC), and marine protected area advisory bodies Western Arctic Marine Protected Area Steering Committee (WAMPA) and marine protected area working groups.

This indicator was prepared by the Government of the Northwest Territories, Department of Environment and Nature Resources, using information obtained from Government of Canada reports and websites and the Inuvialuit Final Agreement. The indicator was reviewed by Fisheries and Oceans Canada (Marine Planning and Conservation Program).

 

NWT Focus

With the NWT having approximately 1,400 km of coastline on the Beaufort Sea of the Arctic Ocean, marine-based features have ecological, cultural, and economic value to NWT residents. Many species depend on both the marine and terrestrial environment, including polar bears (Ursus maritimus), ringed and bearded seal, and seabirds such as thick-billed murres (Uria lomvia arra) and black guillemots (Cepphus grille). These animals will den or nest on land, utilize the ice and snow, and obtain their food from the ocean. The ocean off the coastline of the NWT is the marine portion of the Inuvialuit Settlement Region. Several Inuvialuit communities are located on the coast and residents harvest many resources from the ocean. Resources harvested may serve multiple purposes, including subsistence, cultural and commercial use. For example, harvesting seals provides food for subsistence as well as pelts which form a component of the NWT arts and craft industry. There is potential in the Beaufort Sea for other industries based on both renewable resources (e.g. commercial fishing) and non-renewable resources (e.g. oil and gas extraction).

 

Current View: status and trends

Currently 5,322 km2 of NWT marine is in protected areas (2.1% of the NWT marine base).

At present, there are two marine protected area in the coastal waters of the NWT established by Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) under the federal Oceans Act (1996) (Ref. 1).

The Tarium Niryutait Marine Protected Area (Figure 1) was established in 2010 as a result of a collaborative effort by DFO, the Inuvialuit, co-management bodies, private industry, local stakeholders and governments. Tarium Niryutait is approximately 1,800 km2 in size and located in the Mackenzie River delta and estuary of the Beaufort Sea. The marine protected area conservation objective is to “conserve and protect beluga whales and other marine species (anadromous fish, waterfowl and seabirds), their habitats and their supporting ecosystem” (Ref. 2).

The Anguniaqvia niqiqyuam Marine Protected Area (Figure 1), named in memory of Nelson Green’s traditional hunting area, was established in 2016 near the community of Paulatuk. This area was established to “maintain the integrity of the marine environment offshore of the Cape Parry Migratory Bird Sanctuary so that it is productive and allows for higher trophic level feeding… [and] to maintain the habitat to support populations of key species (such as beluga whales, Arctic char, and ringed and bearded seals)” (Ref. 3). The area is culturally important to the Inuvialuit who use it for subsistence harvesting.

Protection of the marine environment is also accomplished by some Migratory Bird Sanctuaries (MBS), administered by the Canadian Wildlife Service of Environment and Climate Change Canada. In the Beaufort Sea, the Cape Parry MBS extends up to 350 m into the ocean from shore, the Kendall Island MBS is located in a delta environment and includes the water among the islands, the Anderson River Delta MBS includes ocean where the river delta opens into Liverpool Bay, and both Banks Island MBSs also include some bays and near-shore ocean.

The marine area off the coastline of the NWT is the marine portion of the Inuvialuit Settlement Region. For marine planning purposes this area is known as the Beaufort Sea Large Ocean Management Area (LOMA). The Beaufort Sea LOMA includes portions of three of Canada’s 12 ecologically defined ocean bioregions (Figure 1).

At present, all of the marine protected areas in the Beaufort Sea (the Tarium Niryutait and Anguniaqvia Niqiqyuam Marine Protected Areas, the waters protected by MBSs and the Liverpool Bay/Husky Lakes area) fall within the Western Arctic region (Figure 1).

 

Figure 1: Map of Canada’s Arctic Bioregions, from the National Framework for Canada’s Network of Marine Protected Areas (Ref. 4), with established marine protected areas. Map produced by ECC, GNWT

 

Looking around

Canada has committed to developing a national network of marine protected areas in Canada’s three oceans. The goals for Canada’s marine protected areas network are described in the National Framework for Canada’s Network of Marine Protected Areas (Ref. 4). The primary goal is “to provide long-term protection of marine biodiversity, ecosystem function and special natural features.” The design of Canada’s national network of marine protected areas is to include areas that are representative of the various ocean ecosystems.

For the purposes of planning the national network of marine protected areas, 12 broad ocean bioregions have been defined by DFO. Parks Canada had previously defined 24 smaller marine regions which they use specifically for planning National Marine Conservation Areas (Ref. 5). Parks Canada has been mandated with setting up a system of marine protected areas under the Canada National Marine Conservation Areas Act (2002) (Ref. 6) to represent the marine ecosystems found in Canada’s oceans (24 marine regions) and the Great Lakes (five marine regions). These National Marine Conservation Areas to be established by Parks Canada will contribute to the overall national network of marine protected areas in the 12 ocean bioregions.

 

Looking forward

In 2010, the United Nations Convention on Biodiversity adopted a global Strategic Plan for Biodiversity which included Aichi Target 11, the marine component of which is to protect and conserve 10 percent of the world’s coastal and marine areas. In response, in 2015 the Government of Canada developed a series of national targets known as “The 2020 Biodiversity Goals and Targets for Canada.” Target 1, in this set reflects the Aichi Target 11 and Canada’s commitment to protecting and conserving 10 percent of its coastal and marine areas by 2020. This commitment was met in August 2019 and now the Government of Canada has committed to an ambitious new target of protecting and conserving 25 per cent of marine and coastal areas by 2025, and working towards 30 per cent by 2030 (Ref. 7).

 

Find out more

For more information about protected marine areas in the NWT visit:

 

References

Ref. 1.  Government of Canada. 1996. Oceans Act. Available at: http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/o-2.4/

Ref. 2.  Government of Canada. 2019. Tarium Niryutait Marine Protected Area. Available at: https://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/oceans/mpa-zpm/tarium-niryutait/index-eng.htm

Ref. 3.  Government of Canada. 2019. Anguniaqvia niqiqyuam Marine Protected Area. Available at: https://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/oceans/mpa-zpm/anguniaqvia-niqiqyuam/index-eng.html

Ref. 4.  Government of Canada. National Framework for Canada’s Network of Marine Protected Areas. Available at: https://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/oceans/publications/mpanf-cnzpm/page02-eng.html

Ref. 5.  Parks Canada. Canada’s National Marine Conservation Areas System Plan. Available at: http://www.pc.gc.ca/progs/amnc-nmca/systemplan/index_e.asp.

Ref. 6.  Government of Canada. 2002. Canada National Marine Conservation Areas Act. Available at: http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-7.3/index.html

Ref. 7.  Government of Canada. Reaching Canada’s Marine Conservation Targets. Available at: https://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/oceans/conservation/plan/index-eng.html

 

20.4 Trends in Protection of Culturally Important Areas and Practices

 

Caribou, NWT. - GNWT

This indicator currently measures the number of cultural sites and landscapes that are included in the protected areas of the Northwest Territories (NWT) and will in the future be expanded to look at the conservation network as a whole. Culturally significant areas of the NWT include areas where traditional and contemporary Indigenous land use practices such as camping, travelling, hunting, trapping, fishing, plant harvesting, and spiritual activities take place.

Recorded archaeological sites are used to measure this indicator. Archaeological sites in the NWT are classed into five different categories based on the time period in which a site was occupied. The number of sites that are found within a protected area is expressed as a percentage of the total number of known archaeological sites within the NWT. Cultural values data for protected areas is found in management plans and State of the Park reports for national parks and federally managed national historic sites, and from the Prince of Wales Northern Heritage Centre’s NWT Archaeological Sites Database for the NWT overall.

This indicator was prepared by the Government of the Northwest Territories, Department of Environment and Nature Resources, using information obtained from the Environmental Stewardship and Climate Change Division. The indicator was reviewed by the Department of Education, Culture and Employment.

 

NWT Focus

In the NWT, the term land cannot be separated from culture. The way of life that Indigenous people lived, and continue to live, is based on the land. The use of land areas for hunting and trapping, and lakes and rivers for fishing and travel routes, defines everyday life. The land is the foundation of the cultures of Indigenous peoples.

Because of this tie between land and culture, protecting areas with cultural significance often simultaneously protects areas of ecological importance. These may be large landscape-level areas, such as caribou calving, animal migration, and bird nesting areas, or they may be on a smaller scale, representing special features on the landscape such as springs where clean water is collected.

 

Current View: status and trend

For this indicator, archaeological data is used to evaluate the protection of cultural areas. There are 6,565 known archaeological sites in the NWT, and they are classified into five categories based on the time period in which they were occupied. Data on the number of sites found in protected area of the NWT is presented in Table 1.

Table 1: Archaeological Sites within Protected Areas

The data show that protected areas in the NWT include some cultural areas. This is expected, as cultural sites are found across the NWT.

It is important to note that all archaeological sites in the NWT are protected by legislation, regardless of whether they are located in a protected area or not (Ref. 1).

Some protected areas in the NWT protect cultural areas even though they may have originally been selected for ecological protection, while some of the protected areas in the NWT become protected areas mainly because of their cultural value.

Saoyú-Ɂehdacho National Historic Site of Canada consists of two peninsulas in Great Bear Lake which are teaching, healing and spiritual places, essential to the cultural well-being of the Sahtúgot’įnę -- “the people of Sahtú.” The area was proposed for protection by the community of Délįne in 1999, and since 2009, the land has been protected and administered by Parks Canada (Ref. 2). Another area, Ezǫdzìtì, was established under the Tłįchǫ Agreement as “a heritage resource of historical and cultural significance to the Tłįchǫ First Nation and to all Canadians” (Ref. 3). Fort Smith Mission Historic Park is a small Heritage Park established under the NWT Territorial Parks Act to protect what remains of the original Oblate Catholic Mission which was constructed in the early 1900s and forms the centre of the town of Fort Smith.

 

Looking around

Cultural sites and landscapes are recognized nationally and internationally and protected in other provinces and territories in Canada.

World Heritage Sites include culturally important areas, which are recognized and protected, such as Head-Smashed-In Buffalo Jump in Alberta, where Indigenous people hunted buffalo for 6,000 years (Ref. 4). The site is recognized internationally and protected by the Province of Alberta.

National Historic Sites of Canada include not only battlefields and forts, but also include locations and landscapes with cultural significance to Indigenous people. An example is Kejimkujik National Park and National Historic Site of Canada in Nova Scotia, which is considered a cultural landscape that attests to 4,000 years of Mi’kmaq occupancy of the area, and includes petroglyph sites, habitation sites, fishing sites, hunting territories, travel routes and burials (Ref. 5).

In Ontario, the mandate for creation of Provincial Parks includes areas of cultural heritage. “Protecting provincially significant elements of Ontario’s natural and cultural heritage” is written directly within the Provincial Parks and Conservation Reserves Act as part of the purpose and objectives of the Act (Ref. 6). Ontario considers 13 different cultural “themes”, ranging from indigenous settlements to forest industry communities to military, and more than one third of these themes are represented in provincial parks (Ref. 7).

 

Looking forward

As archaeological sites are located across the NWT, it is likely that the number located in protected areas will increase as the protected areas in the NWT are established. However, a large proportion of the archaeological sites discovered in the NWT are found due to impact assessment studies for development projects. As such, the total number of known cultural sites in the NWT will likely always increase at a greater rate than the number of sites in protected areas. As a result, archaeological sites may not be the best indicator for measuring trends in the protection of cultural sites. Better trend data may be land use data, where areas of cultural importance to the communities of the NWT are mapped out based on traditional trails and travel routes, hunting and fishing sites, etc. This data could then be overlaid to determine how many culturally significant sites are included within protected areas.

Future State of the Environment reporting will expand this indicator to include not only protected areas of the NWT but also conservation areas within the conservation network. Conservation areas are lands which are protected for conservation purposes but with less stringent protection than protected areas, for example conservation zones in land use plans, which also use cultural information when determining zoning.

Furthermore, with the development of the Protected Areas Act, one of the three primary goals for new Territorial Protected Areas is the protection of cultural continuity. Ensuring that traditional ways of life and practices can continue and are supported alongside biodiversity conservation is integral to the success of these protected areas. The GNWT will continue to work with Indigenous partners in the management of Territorial Protected Areas to ensure that this goal is achieved and will expand on its reporting for these initiatives in the future.

 

Find out more

UNESCO World Heritage - http://whc.unesco.org/

National Historic Sites of Canada - http://www.pc.gc.ca/progs/lhn-nhs/index.aspx

NWT Archaeological Program (with Fieldwork Reports), Prince of Wales Northern Heritage Centre -

http://www.pwnhc.ca/cultural-places/archaeology-program/

 

Technical Notes

Data for cultural values is not complete and what is publicly available is largely limited to archaeological data. Archaeological sites are only one type of cultural value in protected areas. For the purposes of this report, analysis has been largely limited to archaeological sites due to the limitations of the available data. It is hoped that future reporting will cover cultural values data beyond those values that are covered here.

It is important to recognize that the number of sites in a given protected area only reflects the level of effort of archaeological survey in that area rather than the actual density of archaeological sites. As such this data is not systematic, but rather a reflection where archaeologists have looked for sites. Each area will have many more sites that haven’t been recorded. It is important to keep this in mind when comparing the number of archaeological sites between areas and the density of known sites outside of protected areas.

Archaeological sites, where artifacts have been left, are classified in this report into five categories:

  1. Prehistoric sites represent some of the earliest North American cultures and predate the initial contact with Europeans in the NWT in about 1780.
  2. Indigenous Historic Sites were sites created by indigenous people post-contact.
  3. Historic Sites refer to non-indigenous post-contact archaeological sites.
  4. Contemporary archaeological sites are those which might be still in use by northerners, such as campgrounds or prime hunting locations.
  5. Unknown, Mixed or Other sites are those archaeological sites which do not fit well within one category or the origins are undetermined.

There are 6949 unique instances of these classification categories in the Prince of Wales Northern Heritage Centre’s Archsites database, 770 resulting from sites with multiple classification values. Sites may have multiple classification values for a number of reasons, as a single site may have been occupied multiple times throughout history.

 

References

Ref. 1.  Government of the Northwest Territories, Justice. 2014. Archaeological Sites Act and Archaeological Sites Regulations. Available at: http://www.justice.gov.nt.ca/legislation/SearchLeg&Reg.shtml

Ref. 2.  Parks Canada. Saoyú-Ɂehdacho National Historic Site of Canada. Available at: http://www.pc.gc.ca/eng/lhn-nhs/nt/Saoyu-ehdacho/index.aspx

Ref. 3.  Tłįchǫ Agreement, Section 17.6.1. Available at: https://www.aadnc-aandc.gc.ca/eng/1292948193972/1292948598544

Ref. 4.   Alberta Culture and Tourism. Head-Smashed-In Buffalo Jump World Heritage Site. Available at: http://www.history.alberta.ca/headsmashedin/

Ref. 5.  Parks Canada. Kejimkujik National Park and National Historic Site of Canada. Available at: http://www.pc.gc.ca/eng/pn-np/ns/kejimkujik/natcul/cul/cul2.aspx

Ref. 6.  Ontario. 2006. Provincial Parks and Conservation Reserves Act. Available at: http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statutes/english/elaws_statutes_06p12_e.htm

Ref. 7.   Ontario. 2011. State of Ontario’s Protected Areas Report. Available at: http://www.ontario.ca/environment-and-energy/state-ontarios-protected-areas-report-full-report